M. Studeny: Characterization of essential graphs by means of an operation of legal component merging. In Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Probabilistic Graphical Models (PGM'02) (J. A. Gamez, A. Salmeron eds.), University Castilla la Mancha 2002, pages 161-168.

Abstract
One of the most common ways of representing classes of equivalent Bayesian networks is the use of essential graphs. These chain graphs are also known in the literature as completed patterns or completed pdags. The name essential graph was proposed by Andersson, Madigan and Perlman (1997) who also gave a graphical characterization of essential graphs. In this contribution an alternative characterization of essential graphs is presented. The main observation is that every essential graph is the largest chain graph within a special class of chain graphs. More precisely, every equivalence class of Bayesian networks is contained in an equivalence class of chain graphs without flags (= certain induced subgraphs). A special operation of legal merging of (connectivity) components for a chain graph without flags is introduced. This operation leads to an algorithm for finding the essential graph on the basis of any graph in that equivalence class of chain graphs without flags which contains the equivalence class of a Bayesian network. In particular, the algorithm may start with any Bayesian network.

AMS classification 68T30, 62H05

Keywords
Bayesian network
chain graph
essential graphs
flag
legal merging

A pdf copy of a preprint (330kB) is available.

The paper partially builds on the work: